More Minimum Wage Increases as the Income Equality Debate Heats Up

by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Contact

Our recent blog post on several state minimum wage increases noted that 13 states raised their minimum wages as of January 1, 2014 and that California’s minimum wage is set to increase to $9.00 per hour effective July 1, 2014. In addition, the mayor of the District of Columbia, Vincent Gray, signed legislation on Wednesday, January 15, 2014, that would increase the D.C. minimum wage over a three-year period to $11.50 per hour by July 1, 2016. The initial increase in the D.C. minimum wage takes effect on July 1, 2014, when it increases to $9.50 from the current rate of $8.25. The second increase to $10.50 is scheduled to go into effect on July 1, 2015, while the last increase occurs in 2016. All this comes after Mayor Gray, in September 2013, vetoed a proposed “living wage” bill that would have required large retailers to pay their employees an hourly rate of at least $12.50.

This legislation, which was passed by the D.C. City Council, highlights the efforts at the state and local levels to increase the minimum wage while the U.S. Congress begins to focus its attention on the federal minimum wage. All these developments are taking place against the backdrop of increased talk in the administration about the inequality in the distribution of income and the lack of economic mobility in the country. Employers can expect more states to entertain legislation increasing various state minimum wages as many state legislatures begin their legislative sessions this month.

On the federal level, a number of legislative proposals to increase the federal minimum wage have been introduced during the 113th Congress, including the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2013 (S. 460, H.R. 1010, and H.R. 3746) and the Minimum Wage Fairness Act (S.1737). Each bill would increase the federal minimum wage to $10.10 per hour over a two-year period. In addition, each proposal would index future increases in the federal minimum wage to the Consumer Price Index. H.R. 1010 was introduced by Congressman George Miller (CA-11) and has 174 sponsors, while H.R. 3746 was introduced by Congressman John B. Larson (CT-1). Both Senate bills, S. 460 and S.1737, were introduced by Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (IA). S.1737, which has 29 co-sponsors, has been placed on the Senate calendar, thus bypassing any HELP Committee consideration. The Senate plans to consider it next month. Some in Congress want to increase the minimum wage or use it as a political issue should the bills fail, and the debate looks to start in the Senate.

Finally, the larger issues of income inequality and economic mobility are topics attracting greater attention and study. Among the statistics that President Obama cited in his December 4, 2013, speech on this topic was that the top 10 percent most affluent households received 50 percent of the pre-tax household income. He also noted that the average CEO today makes more than 273 times the income of the average worker, whereas in the past, he or she earned 20 to 30 times the average worker’s income. On the topic of economic mobility, the president stated that a child born in the top 20 percent had approximately a 2-in-3 chance of staying in or near the top 20 percent, while a child born in the bottom 20 percent had less than a 1-in-20 chance of making it to the top 20 percent. Countries like Canada, Germany, and even France, the president continued, have greater economic mobility than the United States has.

Income equality has been studied by government agencies, economists, academics, think tanks, public policy groups, among others, so there is no shortage of fodder on this topic. In an effort to connect the fight to increase the federal minimum wage with the challenges created by income inequality in the United States, the nonpartisan think tank, the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) held a briefing on January 14, 2014, in support of raising the federal minimum wage. EPI estimates that an increase in the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour would provide a raise to 27.8 million employees who would receive roughly an additional $35 billion in income and that the increase would also create some 85,000 jobs.

Thus, as this election year progresses, we can expect to hear more about the macro challenge of income equality and economic mobility as well as about the political struggle to increase the minimum wage on federal, state, and local levels.

- See more at: http://blog.ogletreedeakins.com/more-minimum-wage-increases-as-the-income-equality-debate-heats-up/#sthash.qyKCA3l7.dpuf

Our recent blog post on several state minimum wage increases noted that 13 states raised their minimum wages as of January 1, 2014 and that California’s minimum wage is set to increase to $9.00 per hour effective July 1, 2014. In addition, the mayor of the District of Columbia, Vincent Gray, signed legislation on Wednesday, January 15, 2014, that would increase the D.C. minimum wage over a three-year period to $11.50 per hour by July 1, 2016. The initial increase in the D.C. minimum wage takes effect on July 1, 2014, when it increases to $9.50 from the current rate of $8.25. The second increase to $10.50 is scheduled to go into effect on July 1, 2015, while the last increase occurs in 2016. All this comes after Mayor Gray, in September 2013, vetoed a proposed “living wage” bill that would have required large retailers to pay their employees an hourly rate of at least $12.50.

This legislation, which was passed by the D.C. City Council, highlights the efforts at the state and local levels to increase the minimum wage while the U.S. Congress begins to focus its attention on the federal minimum wage. All these developments are taking place against the backdrop of increased talk in the administration about the inequality in the distribution of income and the lack of economic mobility in the country. Employers can expect more states to entertain legislation increasing various state minimum wages as many state legislatures begin their legislative sessions this month.

On the federal level, a number of legislative proposals to increase the federal minimum wage have been introduced during the 113th Congress, including the Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2013 (S. 460, H.R. 1010, and H.R. 3746) and the Minimum Wage Fairness Act (S.1737). Each bill would increase the federal minimum wage to $10.10 per hour over a two-year period. In addition, each proposal would index future increases in the federal minimum wage to the Consumer Price Index. H.R. 1010 was introduced by Congressman George Miller (CA-11) and has 174 sponsors, while H.R. 3746 was introduced by Congressman John B. Larson (CT-1). Both Senate bills, S. 460 and S.1737, were introduced by Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee Chairman Tom Harkin (IA). S.1737, which has 29 co-sponsors, has been placed on the Senate calendar, thus bypassing any HELP Committee consideration. The Senate plans to consider it next month. Some in Congress want to increase the minimum wage or use it as a political issue should the bills fail, and the debate looks to start in the Senate.

Finally, the larger issues of income inequality and economic mobility are topics attracting greater attention and study. Among the statistics that President Obama cited in his December 4, 2013, speech on this topic was that the top 10 percent most affluent households received 50 percent of the pre-tax household income. He also noted that the average CEO today makes more than 273 times the income of the average worker, whereas in the past, he or she earned 20 to 30 times the average worker’s income. On the topic of economic mobility, the president stated that a child born in the top 20 percent had approximately a 2-in-3 chance of staying in or near the top 20 percent, while a child born in the bottom 20 percent had less than a 1-in-20 chance of making it to the top 20 percent. Countries like Canada, Germany, and even France, the president continued, have greater economic mobility than the United States has.

Income equality has been studied by government agencies, economists, academics, think tanks, public policy groups, among others, so there is no shortage of fodder on this topic. In an effort to connect the fight to increase the federal minimum wage with the challenges created by income inequality in the United States, the nonpartisan think tank, the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) held a briefing on January 14, 2014, in support of raising the federal minimum wage. EPI estimates that an increase in the minimum wage to $10.10 per hour would provide a raise to 27.8 million employees who would receive roughly an additional $35 billion in income and that the increase would also create some 85,000 jobs.

Thus, as this election year progresses, we can expect to hear more about the macro challenge of income equality and economic mobility as well as about the political struggle to increase the minimum wage on federal, state, and local levels.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Contact
more
less

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!