Motions to Amend in Inter Partes Review Proceedings - A Quick Reference ; IIPI/BBNA AIA Post-Grant Patent Practice Conference

more+
less-

Statutory Basis: 35 U.S.C. § 316(d).

Rule: 37 C.F.R. § 42.121.

Guidance: Office Patent Trial Practice Guide (OPTPG), 77 Fed. Reg. 48766-67.

PTAB Decisions: Some discussed below.

1) Board approach to motions to amend highly restrictive. THIS IS NOT LIKE REEXAMINATION.

2) Procedural Requirements/Limitations

a. Generally only one opportunity to move to amend claims.

i. To be filed no later than with Patent Owner Response Rule 42.121(a)(1). No opportunity to amend claims with Preliminary Response. Rule 42.107(d).

b. Must discuss motion to amend with Board in conference call in advance of filing. Rule 42.121(a).

c. Proposed claim amendments may be contingent or non-contingent -- to be clearly stated in motion. Idle Free Systems, Inc. v. Bergstrom, Inc., IPR 2012-00027, Paper 26 at 10.

Please see full guide below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Inter Partes Review Proceedings, Motion to Amend, Patent Litigation, Patents

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Banner & Witcoff, Ltd. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »