New York Federal Court Denies Summary Judgment Of Retaliation Claim Despite Plaintiff’s Discharge For Falsifying Documents

Explore:  Retaliation

Sass v. MTA Bus Co., 10-CV-4079, (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2012): The plaintiff, a former bus maintenance supervisor at the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bus Company (MTA Bus), sued MTA Bus alleging retaliation in violation of state and federal law. In March 2008, the plaintiff reported an MTA Bus roster containing two Nazi symbols to his supervisor, who failed to take any action. Thereafter, the plaintiff gave a copy of the roster to his co-worker, who provided it to management, prompting an investigation by the Chief Officer of Operation Improvement and Internal Studies. During the investigation, the plaintiff stated that he had previously given the document to his supervisor, who failed to take action. The investigation also revealed that the document had been altered and that the plaintiff misrepresented certain facts. After the disciplinary hearing, MTA Bus discharged the plaintiff and gave his co-worker a 30-day suspension and final warning. 

Note: This article was published in the December 2012 issue of the New York eAuthority.

Topics:  Retaliation

Published In: Civil Rights Updates, Labor & Employment Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »