NEWS ALERT: California Supreme Court Issues Mixed Bag Decision Re: Class and Representative Waivers in Employment Arbitration Agreements

NEWS ALERT: California Supreme Court Issues Mixed Bag Decision Re: Class and Representative Waivers in Employment Arbitration Agreements

Today, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, Inc. The Court upheld the general enforceability of class waivers in mandatory employment arbitration agreements, concluding that its prior decision holding to the contrary in Gentry v. Superior Court, 42 Cal.4th 443 (2007) had been abrogated by U.S. Supreme Court precedent. Importantly, however, the Court created an exception for representative actions under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”) (Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.), holding that “an arbitration agreement requiring an employee as a condition of employment to give up the right to bring representative PAGA actions in any forum is contrary to public policy.” Please stay tuned for a more detailed analysis of the decision in this week’s newsletter.

- See more at: http://www.manatt.com/Employment_Law/NEWS_ALERT__California_Supreme_Court_Issues_Mixed_Bag_Decision_Re__Class_and_Representative_Waivers_in_Employment_Arbitration_Agreements.aspx?search=1#sthash.y7n3JovM.dpuf

Today, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, Inc. The Court upheld the general enforceability of class waivers in mandatory employment arbitration agreements, concluding that its prior decision holding to the contrary in Gentry v. Superior Court, 42 Cal.4th 443 (2007) had been abrogated by U.S. Supreme Court precedent. Importantly, however, the Court created an exception for representative actions under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”) (Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.), holding that “an arbitration agreement requiring an employee as a condition of employment to give up the right to bring representative PAGA actions in any forum is contrary to public policy.” Please stay tuned for a more detailed analysis of the decision in this week’s newsletter.

 

 

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×