No T.K.O. in Beverage Wars


Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court decided the case, Pom Wonderful v. Coca-Cola, in favor of Pom Wonderful. The Court found that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s rules do not narrow the requirements of the Lanham Act.

The case arose when Coca-Cola introduced a beverage that contained 98% apple and grape juice, labeled as ‘pomegranate and blueberry’  blended juice. Coca-Cola defended its position by arguing that the labeling complied with the FDA’s food labeling requirements under the 1990 amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act called Nutritional Educational Labeling Act of 1990. The NLEA regulations, Coke argued, precluded a Lanham Act claim by Pom Wonderful. While the Ninth Circuit agreed with Coke, the Supreme Court did not.

This decision highlights the importance of pre-product-launch labeling and advertising review for food and beverage products. The very practical take-away from this case is that food and beverage manufacturers must take steps carefully to comply with both the FDA regulations and the Lanham Act’s prohibitions on making misleading statements to consumers.



Topics:  Advertising, Coca Cola, FDA, FDCA, Food Labeling, Lanham Act, NLEA, POM Wonderful, POM Wonderful v Coca Cola, SCOTUS

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Communications & Media Updates, Consumer Protection Updates, Products Liability Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Faegre Baker Daniels | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »