Noncompete News: Minnesota Court Refuses to Create Non-compete Agreement Where None Exists, Denies Temporary Restraining Order

more+
less-

A Minnesota court recently issued a decision that provides several good practice pointers for employers who wish to protect their proprietary relationships and information, or who wish to retain individuals who may have had access to such information while employed elsewhere.

The case, Omnetics Connector Corporation v. Ulti-Mate Connectors, Inc., et al., involved two companies that manufacture and sell miniature electrical connector products. An employee of Omnetics contacted Ulti-Mate about a potential position as an independent sales representative, and also forwarded some mechanical drawings to a contractor of Ulti-Mate, who testified that he did not forward the drawings to Ulti-Mate or use them in any way.

Please see full newsletter below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, General Business Updates, Labor & Employment Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© FordHarrison | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

We have over 200 lawyers in 25 offices across the country, including five affiliate offices.... View Profile »


Follow FordHarrison:

Reporters on Deadline