Orphans' Court Update - Pennsylvania Supreme Court Changes Rule On Dual Commissions


[author: Kimberly M. Colonna]


For well over 60 years, Pennsylvania law has provided that, for trusts created before 1945, an entity that was paid a commission as the estate executor was not entitled to a trustee's commission paid from the principal of the trust.  A 2011 decision from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has changed this rule in a way that benefits trustees.


A Pennsylvania statute that was in effect until 1945 provided that where the same person fulfilled the duties of executor and trustee, that person was not permitted to receive more than one commission paid from principal.  Although that statute had been repealed, in 1951 the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a decision, In re Williamson, that said that the prohibition against dual commissions must be applied to any trust that was created before 1945.  The Williamson decision reasoned that applying a newer statute (which did not ban dual commissions) retroactively to those pre-1945 trusts would be unconstitutional.  For many years, the Williamson decision has presented a hurdle for institutional trustees of long-existing trusts.  If a trust was created before 1945 and the institutional trustee had received a commission for serving as the executor of the estate, the institution was unable to obtain a trustee's commission on the trust principal, even when the executor's fee had been paid decades earlier and the trustee had undertaken significant fiduciary duties and provided extensive services for the trust. 


The 2011 decision in Estate of Fridenberg has resolved this problem.  Fridenberg involved a will from 1938 that created a trust and named a trust company as co-trustee and co-executor of the estate.  The trust company was paid an executor's commission when the grantor died in 1940.  Wachovia Bank was the corporate successor to the trust company, and in 2005, it filed an account which included a request for a commission paid from the trust principal for trustee services provided between 1978 and 2005.  The Attorney General argued that Wachovia was not entitled to be paid a trustee's commission from the principal of the trust.  The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled for Wachovia and said that the rule announced in Williamson would no longer apply.  The Court cited to the development of modern trust law, which showed the legislature's intent to end the ban on dual commissions.  The Court also made the broader point that modern trust law imposes significant duties and risks upon trustees, such that trustees have to be more active in managing the trust assets, and are, therefore, entitled to a commission from principal.  Finally, the Court ruled that applying existing statutes regarding trustee compensation to the pre-1945 trust at issue was not unconstitutional.


In short, Pennsylvania no longer has a general prohibition against dual commissions for pre-1945 trusts.  Trustees of long-existing or perpetual trusts should consult counsel about what commissions are available to them in light of the Fridenberg ruling.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.