Plaintiff’s Standing And Choice Of Forum Are Upheld

Morris James LLP
Contact

Hologic, Inc., et al. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc., C.A. No. 15-1031 - SLR, February 29, 2016

Robinson, J. Defendant’s motion to transfer is denied. Defendant’s motion to strike plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction is denied.

Defendant seeks to transfer this action to the Northern District of California where it has its headquarters and sole place of business. Defendant claims that because it is a start-up company with only one product and no sales yet in Delaware, the balance of hardship weighs in favor of transfer. The court reasons that a company having accepted the benefits of incorporation in Delaware should not be successful in arguing that this forum is inconvenient.  While litigating in Delaware may be more expensive due to retaining Delaware counsel and travel, the court declines to elevate the convenience of one party over the other. Defendant claims that when the complaint was filed, the patents-in-suit were owned by plaintiff’s subsidiary.  Plaintiff alleges that it has complete control over its subsidiary’s patent licensing and enforcement policies and has had control over the patents-in-suit. It therefore has equitable standing to pursue injunctive relief.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Morris James LLP

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide