News & Analysis as of

Patent Infringement

Utility Patents in Fashion Design? Nike & Huzu Innovate The Way

by Knobbe Martens on

Edited by Catherine Holland   What is a Utility Patent? Utility patents cover a new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter.  Design patents are much more common in the fashion industry since design...more

Global Patent Prosecution Newsletter - September 2017

Worldwide Doctrine of Equivalents and Prosecution History Estoppel - The doctrine of equivalents (DOE) arises in the context of a patent infringement action where the accused product or process does not literally infringe...more

Delaware Chief Judge Issues Guidelines for Venue in Patent Cases

by Morgan Lewis on

The court finds that some physical presence is required to satisfy the venue standard. On September 11, 2017, Chief Judge Leonard Stark of the US District Court for the District of Delaware handed down two decisions...more

At The Bench: 2017 Mid-Year Case Review

Impression Prods. v. Lexmark Int’l, 137 S. Ct. 1523, 581 U.S. ___ (2017) The Supreme Court held that all patent rights are exhausted upon the first sale of a patented product, regardless of where the sale is made or...more

Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. Allmax Nutrition, Inc. (S.D. Cal. 2017)

Last month, in Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. Allmax Nutrition, Inc., District Judge Marilyn L. Huff of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California denied a Motion for Reconsideration filed by...more

Fresh From the Bench: Precedential Patent Cases From the Federal Circuit

In Allied v. OSMI, the Circuit affirms dismissal of a declaratory judgment action even though Allied’s Mexican distributors had been sued in Mexico on a corresponding Mexican patent. In a first Waymo v. Uber case, the panel...more

Judge Talwani Dismisses Diagnostic Patent Infringement Case under Section 101

In a recent patent infringement case relating to a method for diagnosing a neuro-muscular disorder, Judge Indira Talwani in the District of Massachusetts found the asserted patent claims to be patent ineligible because the...more

Federal Circuit Review - August 2017

by Knobbe Martens on

District Court Abused Discretion in Ignoring Federal Circuit Mandate to Reconsider Attorneys’ Fees Under Octane Fitness - In Adjustacam, LLC v. Newegg, Inc., Appeal No. 2016-1882, the Federal Circuit held that a district...more

Bob Parsons’ golf equipment startup PXG tees up patent infringement suit against TaylorMade three days before major product...

by Butler Snow LLP on

The great Bobby Jones, himself a lawyer, once said that “Competitive golf is played mainly on a five-and-a-half-inch course … the space between your ears.” I don’t know if Mr. Jones ever practiced patent law, but the...more

Framework for Swiss-form claim construction in Australia: Is it really about objective intent?

by FPA Patent Attorneys on

This article looks at the current status of construction of Swiss-style claims in Australia, provides a framework by which construction of Swiss-style claims can be assessed, and concludes that although the position is not...more

The Biosimilars Council Supports Sandoz’s Preemption Position in Federal Circuit Amicus Brief

by Goodwin on

Last week the Biosimilars Council submitted an amicus brief in the Federal Circuit remand proceedings for Amgen v. Sandoz, arguing that Amgen’s state-law claims for Sandoz’s failure to comply with the patent dance’s...more

BI Files Answer to AbbVie’s Complaint in Adalimumab Litigation

by Goodwin on

As we previously reported, last month AbbVie filed a complaint against Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware regarding BI’s aBLA for a biosimilar version of AbbVie’s Humira...more

Video Game Network Patent Found to Be Patent Eligible – Not an Abstract Idea

The Federal District Court in Delaware recently denied a motion to dismiss a patent infringement case involving a video game networking technology patent based on the patent allegedly being invalid for lack of...more

Scheduling Order Entered in Janssen v. Samsung Bioepis

by Goodwin on

This morning, the district court in Janssen v. Samsung Bioepis, which concerns Samsung Bioepis’ Renflexis® (infliximab-abda) biosimilar product, entered a pretrial scheduling order. The scheduling order calls for, among other...more

Another Example of Practical Estoppel in IPR Practice

Earlier this year, the Federal Circuit held that statements made by patentees in an inter partes review (IPR) can constitute prosecution disclaimer. Aylus Networks, Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 2016-1599 (Fed. Cir. May 11, 2017)....more

AstraZeneca succeeds in omeprazole patent infringement profits case

by Smart & Biggar on

The Federal Court has issued its Public Judgment and Reasons concerning the financial compensation to be paid to AstraZeneca as a result of Apotex’s infringement of the omeprazole formulation patent (AstraZeneca’s LOSEC) in...more

Knowledge of Ex-Employees Working for Accused Infringer Makes Inducement Claim Plausible

In Lifetime Industries, Inc., v. Trim-Lok, Inc., [2017-1096] (September 7, 2017), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s dismissal of Lifetime’s complaint for infringement of U.S. Patent 6,966,590, failing to...more

Amgen v. Hospira: Litigation Update

by Goodwin on

With the September 18, 2017 trial date fast approaching, the district court in Amgen v. Hospira last week denied Hospira’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of its proposed biosimilar of Epogen®/Procrit®...more

Back to “Normal”?: Patent Venue After TC Heartland

On May 22, 2017, in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, the Supreme Court reversed decades of expansive patent venue interpretation by the Federal Circuit. A succinct 10-page opinion by Justice Thomas...more

At the ITC, It’s Always “Standing” Room Only

Intellectual Ventures Refiles Against Auto Makers After Patent Assignment Fails ITC Scrutiny - The U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) terminated an investigation because standing did not exist as of the date the...more

E.D. Texas Magistrate Recommendations Highlight How Patent Marking Requirements Can Apply To Method Claims

by Orrick - IP Landscape on

Report And Recommendation on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd, v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al., E.D. Tex. (September 4, 2017) (Magistrate Judge Roy Payne) Magistrate Judge Roy Payne’s recent...more

Business Litigation Report - August 2017

Supreme Court Highlights Importance of Statute-Specific Venue Rules - The Supreme Court upended nearly thirty years of practice when it ruled, in the TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC U.S. , 137 S.Ct. 1514...more

U.S. - What does the Impression Products v. Lexmark decision mean for drug companies? 5 takeaways

by Hogan Lovells on

Last May, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a highly-anticipated decision in Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark Int’l, Inc., reversing the Federal Circuit and holding that, when a patent holder sells a product, it exhausts all...more

August 2017: Supreme Court Highlights Importance of Statute-Specific Venue Rules

The Supreme Court upended nearly thirty years of practice when it ruled, in the TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC U.S. , 137 S.Ct. 1514 (May 22, 2017), that actions for patent infringement may only be brought...more

“A Reasonable Adjudicator Would have Wanted to Review this Evidence.”

In Ultratec, Inc. v. Captioncall, LLC., [2016-1706, 2016-1707, 2016-1708, 2016-1709, 2016-1710, 2016-1712, 2016-1713, 2016-1715, 2016-2366] (August 28, 2017), the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded Board decisions...more

3,605 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 145
Cybersecurity

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.