Real Property, Financial Services & Title Insurance Case Law Update: Week Ending October 18, 2013


  • Foreclosure: issue of fact concerning authenticity of “original” promissory note precluded summary judgment – AG Beaumont 1, LLC v LSREF2 Oreo, No. 2D12-5873 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 18, 2013) (reversed and remanded) 
  • Takings: in compensation portion of takings trial court should have allowed jury to consider scientific evidence sufficient to explain how appraisers calculated damages to be awarded to owners of diseased citrus trees taken by state – Fla. Dep’t of Agriculture & Consumer Servs. v. Mendez, No. 4D11-3271 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 16, 2013) (reversed and remanded)



  • Negligence: FDIC-R failed to state a cause of action for negligent hiring, selection, training, and supervision based on allegations that one of its employees had represented one of the parties to the escrow transaction other than the bank in a prior real estate transaction – FDIC-R (Founders) v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., No. 12-cv-5198 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 10, 2013) (order granting motion to dismiss) 
  • Recoupment: principal of title insurance agent estopped from denying benefit from involvement in conspiracy based on guilty plea – Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. Sanford Title Servs., LLC, No. 11-00620 (D. Md. Oct. 8, 2013) (memo opinion granting summary judgment) 
  • Recoupment: title insurer entitled to assert the rights of its insureds against agent, provided it has indemnified its insureds or cleared a title defect – Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. Sanford Title Servs., LLC, No. 11-00620 (D. Md. Oct. 8, 2013) (memo opinion granting summary judgment) 
  • Coverage: title insurer under no duty to identify additional land not described in Schedule A of policy and insured had no claim for land not so described – Batra v. Electronic Land Servs., Inc., No. 52629/2011 (N.Y. Supp. Oct. 7, 2013) (granting motion to dismiss) 
  • Post-judgment Interest: awarding post judgment interest pending appeal – First American Title Ins. Co. v. 273 Water Street, LLC, No. 084041234 (Conn. Super. Sept. 19, 2013) (granting motion for post-judgment interest) [copy not publicly available]


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carlton Fields Jorden Burt | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.