Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending May 20, 2022

Carlton Fields
Contact

Carlton Fields

Real Property Update

  • Foreclosure / Doc Stamp Taxes: Trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting motion for involuntary dismissal of action based on section 201.08(1)(b), Florida Statutes, where documentary stamp taxes had not been paid – Wilmington Tr., N.A. v. Serpa, No. 3D21-1835 (Fla. 3d DCA May 18, 2022) (affirmed in party, and reversed in part)
  • Freclosure / Doc Stamp Taxes: Trial court erred by entering judgment without regard for bank’s payment of outstanding taxes and timely motion to reopen to consider such payment – Wilmington Tr., N.A. v. Serpa, No. 3D21-1835 (Fla. 3d DCA May 18, 2022) (affirmed in party, and reversed in part)

Financial Services Update

  • Lender Liability / Credit Agreement / Conditions Precedent: Because borrower did not timely comply with the conditions precedent for forming the alleged written credit agreement extending the maturity date of her loan, a written credit agreement between the parties did not form – Llanso v. SHEDDF2-FL3, LLC, No. 3D21-783 (Fla. 3d DCA May 18, 2022) (affirmed)
  • Lender Liability / Banking Statute of Frauds / Section 687.0304: Because written credit agreement did not form with borrower, trial court correctly determined that applicable Banking Statute of Frauds precluded borrower’s breach of contract action – Llanso v. SHEDDF2-FL3, LLC, No. 3D21-783 (Fla. 3d DCA May 18, 2022) (affirmed)
  • FCRA / Duty to Investigate: Whether furnisher reasonably investigated disputed reporting and demonstrated the degree of careful inquiry when it verified plaintiff’s demographic and account information using only its internal records, remained an open question – Fowler v. Preferred Collection & Mgmt. Servs., Inc., No. 8:21-cv-01038 (M.D. Fla. May 16, 2022) (order granting in part, and denying in part, summary judgment motion)
  • TILA / Statute of Limitations: Plaintiff’s claim that bank violated TILA by issuing unsolicited credit card in her name and refusing to reverse unauthorized charges was time-barred, as plaintiff was on notice of the card being opened in her name more than three years before filing the lawsuit – Weiner v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 1:21-cv-05957 (S.D.N.Y. May 18, 2022) (granting motion to dismiss)

Title Insurance Update

No cases to report

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carlton Fields | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Carlton Fields
Contact
more
less

Carlton Fields on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide