Real Property & Financial Services Update: Week Ending July 5, 2019

Carlton Fields
Contact

Carlton Fields

Real Property Update

  • Landlord-Tenant: rider to a lease, containing clear and unambiguous language, controlled over the terms in the lease and limited the increase in the operating expenses charged to the tenant by the fixed amount of 3 percent - Dezer Intracoastal Mall, LLC v. Seahorse Grill, LLC, No. 3D18-88 (Fla. 3d DCA July 3, 2019) (affirmed).
  • Foreclosure / Reverse Mortgage: lender cannot foreclose under a reverse mortgage until both co-borrowers have passed away even if the surviving spouse only signed the mortgage, but not the promissory note for the loan - Davis v. OneWest Bank, FSB, No. 3D18-493 (Fla. 3d DCA July 3, 2019) (reversed and remanded).
  • Foreclosure: case involuntarily dismissed where lender based its case at trial on the subject note and a modification, yet the operative complaint neither mentioned nor attached the modification - Morales v. Fifth Third Bank, No. 4D18-3145 (Fla. 4th DCA July 3, 2019) (reversed and remanded).

Financial Services Update

  • RESPA / 1024.41(g) / Modifying Foreclosure Sale Date: motion to reset foreclosure sale date after loan modification is not a violation of RESPA - Landau v. Roundpoint Mortg. Servicing Corp., No. 17-11151 (11th Cir. June 11, 2019) (affirming entry of order dismissing claims with prejudice).
  • TILA / Statute of Limitations: TILA statute of limitations for the recovery of monetary damages is one year from the date the transaction was consummated - Dixon v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC, No. 9:19-cv-80022 (S.D. Fla. July 3, 2019).
  • FDCPA / 1692(d)(5) / Statute of Limitations: applying the "continuing violation" doctrine to an FDCPA claim - Muzyka v. Rash Curtis & Assocs., No. 2:18-cv-01097 (E.D. Cal. July 3, 2019) ("If there is a pattern of allegedly unlawful conduct, a suit is timely filed if it is brought 'within one year of the most recent date on which the defendant is alleged to have violated the FDCPA.'") (quoting Padilla v. Payco Gen. Am. Credits, Inc., 161 F. Supp. 2d 264, 273 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)).

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carlton Fields | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Carlton Fields
Contact
more
less

Carlton Fields on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide