R&W Insurance in Middle-Market M&A

Troutman Pepper
Contact

This article originally appeared in New York Private Equity in Review, 1st Quarter 2015, published by PitchBook and ACG New York. It is reprinted here with permission.

As competition for middle-market M&A transactions becomes more acute, prospective buyers, particularly private equity firms, wishing to distinguish themselves from others may employ representation and warranty insurance (R&W insurance) in their bidding strategies to replace traditional indemnification provisions. R&W insurance allows sellers to transfer risk while providing buyers with a source of recovery separate from the seller proceeds, and permits private equity sellers to quickly return cash to investors rather than leave it in escrow to satisfy future claims. As R&W insurance becomes more commonplace in middle market transactions, buyers should consider the following:

  • R&W insurance policies can protect a buyer from unknown liabilities arising from a seller breach discovered post-closing. However, known risks would require special indemnity coverage apart from the R&W insurance policy.
  • The disconnection between the disclosure and representation and warranty negotiation and the liability for indemnification for breach creates an incentive on the part of the seller to allocate resources differently from that which would be applied where there is material retained risk on the part of the seller.
  • The cost of an R&W insurance policy is usually paid at closing and is a percentage (approximately 2% to 3%) based on the amount of coverage. Buyers and sellers typically negotiate who will pay the premium, and at times purchase price is reduced in exchange for closing with a higher cash amount and less or no escrow or holdback.
  • Often, insurance carriers require some retention of risk by the seller to ensure that some level on moral hazard remains with the seller so that appropriate rigor is applied to disclosure. The premium can vary significantly depending upon the amount of risk that is retained by the seller.
  • There remains no substitute for due diligence on the part of the buyer to assess risk and business and earnings quality of the target.
  • The market has not experienced a significant number of claims to test the equivalence of R&W insurance to general, escrow-backed, indemnification.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Troutman Pepper | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Troutman Pepper
Contact
more
less

Troutman Pepper on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide