SCOTUS ERISA Fee Litigation Update: Hughes et al. v. Northwestern University

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Contact

On January 24, 2022, in a rare, unanimous 8-0 decision (Justice Barrett recused herself from the case), the Supreme Court of the United States (the “Supreme Court”) vacated a Seventh Circuit affirmation of the dismissal of Hughes et al v. Northwestern University, one of the more high-profile cases in the current litany of defined contribution plan fee litigations. 142 S. Ct. 737 (2022). Although, on its face, the Supreme Court’s decision to remand the case back to the lower court for further consideration appears to be a victory for fee litigation plaintiffs across the country, many fee litigation defendants are also finding reason to be pleased with the Supreme Court’s brief ruling. Furthermore, the case serves as an important reminder to plan fiduciaries of the steps they should continue to take to meet their responsibilities with respect to monitoring plan investments, recordkeepers, and associated fees.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Contact
more
less

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide