SCOTUS Will Decide Whether Rule 68 Offers Moot FLSA Collective Actions


The U.S. Supreme Court granted cert on June 25, 2012 in Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk to resolve a federal circuit split on whether an FLSA collective action is mooted when the lone plaintiff receives from defendants an offer of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 that satisfies the plaintiff’s claims.  Under Rule 68, a defendant may offer judgment against it on specified terms.  If the offer is accepted, judgment is entered on the terms offered.  If the offer is not accepted, plaintiff is liable for post-offer costs if the plaintiff fails to ultimately obtain a judgment more favorable than the offer.    

In contrast to Rule 23 class actions, representative actions under the FLSA require similarly situated plaintiffs to opt-in to the lawsuit.  Therefore, until additional parties opt-in, a plaintiff in an FLSA collective suit does not represent others.  Because of this, some federal courts have held that employers may effectively moot an FLSA collective action by making an offer under Rule 68 to resolve the plaintiff’s claims before other plaintiffs opt in to the lawsuit.

However, in Genesis, the Third Circuit declined to moot plaintiff’s FLSA collective action following a Rule 68 offer.  In reaching its decision, the court relied on Supreme Court authority declining to moot an appeal in the Rule 23 context that held:

Requiring multiple plaintiffs to bring separate actions, which effectively could be ‘picked off’ by a defendant’s tender of judgment before an affirmative ruling on class certification could be obtained, obviously would frustrate the objectives of class actions . . .

Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk, 656 F.3d 189, 195 (3d Cir. 2011) (citing Deposit Guar. Nat’l Bank v. Roper, 455 U.S. 326, 339 (1980)).  Finding this same rationale applicable to plaintiff’s FLSA representative action, the Third Circuit declined to dismiss plaintiff’s claims.

Employers should be on the lookout for the Supreme Court’s decision this term.  In addition to providing guidance on the effect of Rule 68 offers, the Supreme Court’s decision in Genesis may also offer valuable insight into the distinction between FLSA collective actions and Rule 23 class actions.


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick - Global Employment Law Group | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.