SEC Announces First Settled Proceeding Against Municipal Issuer under MCDC Initiative


The SEC announced July 8 its first settled administrative proceeding against a municipal issuer under its Municipal Continuing Disclosure Cooperation (“MCDC”) Initiative.  In its Order, the SEC charged Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District with violating ’33 Act § 17(a)(2) by making an untrue statement of material fact in a 2010 bond offering that the District had complied with prior continuing-financial-disclosure obligations (required by Rule 15c2-12) undertaken in other bond offerings sold in 2006 and 2007.  The District certified it had complied with those obligations when, in fact, it had failed to file some of the earlier disclosures.  The District neither admitted nor denied the allegations, but undertook to adopt new compliance policies and procedures, update all prior disclosure filings, cooperate with the Commission’s investigations and disclose the settlement in all offerings over the next five years.  In re Kings Canyon Joint Unified School District, Rel. No. 33-9610, Admin. Proc. File No. 3-15966 (SEC July 8, 2014).

The Kings Canyon settlement terms are standard for issuers who self-report under the SEC’s MCDC Initiative.  The Commission announced the Initiative on March 10 of this year, as part of its broader Dodd-Frank oversight of the nation’s municipal markets.  The Initiative is structured to incentivize issuers to self-report (without any fines) and disclose the securities underwriters involved – who then will face fines and similar settlement terms if they also self-report.  Reporting broker-dealers face fines of $20,000-60,000 per offering (capped at $500,000), independent compliance-consultant review of underwriting and due-diligence policies and practices and continued cooperation.  Commission Staff have indicated they will not vary the MCDC settlement terms and hope to foster “first-in” behavior, saying that firms not self-reporting will face harsher sanctions.

Industry groups (SIFMA and Bond Dealers of America) have asked the Commission Staff for some changes to the Initiative, including extending the program beyond its stated September 10 sunset and lowering the penalty cap below $500,000 for smaller broker-dealers.  Thus far, the Commission Staff has refused to modify the program.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Burr & Forman | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.