SEC Clarifies Conflict Minerals Reporting Requirements

The Securities and Exchange Commission confirmed last week that it expects companies to timely file reports required under the conflict minerals rule and to comply with other provisions unaffected by a recent appellate decision holding a portion of the rule unconstitutional. The guidance was contained in a statement issued on April 29, 2014 by the Director of the SEC Division of Corporate Finance. The clarification followed the April 14, 2014 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. SEC, et al. that certain reporting requirements under the conflict minerals rule violated the First Amendment.

Effectively, reporting companies that file a conflict minerals report are no longer required to describe their products as “DRC conflict free,” having “not been found to be ‘DRC conflict free,’” or “DRC conflict undeterminable.”  Rather, if a company has products that would have merited such a label, the company must disclose the facilities used to produce the conflict minerals, the country of origin of the minerals and the efforts to determine the mine or location of the origin. A company may still voluntarily describe its products using one of the above labels, provided that it has obtained an independent private sector audit. For companies that are not required to file a conflict minerals report, the guidance does not change any of the requirements under the SEC’s conflict minerals rule.

Notwithstanding the SEC’s statement about compliance with Rule 13p-1, such guidance remains subject to further action taken by the SEC or a court. A prior statement issued by two of the five Commissioners recommending a stay of the rule in its entirety pending final resolution of the litigation suggests that the Commission is divided in its response to the issue.

The SEC will consider the need for further guidance on the conflict minerals rule in advance of the June 2, 2014 filing date. We will continue to monitor the case and action by the SEC and provide updates to this alert as necessary.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Armstrong Teasdale LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.