Single Disputed Claim Term Is Considered In Pharmaceutical Case

Morris James LLP
Contact

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Xellia Pharmaceuticals ApS, at al., C.A. No. 14-199 – RGA, January 6, 2015.

Andrews, J.  Markman opinion issues following argument held on December 18, 2014.

A single term is disputed: “a pharmaceutically acceptable amount of an acetate buffer effective to provide a pharmaceutically acceptable pH.” The court finds that the plain and ordinary meaning applies.  In addition, the court finds that plaintiff is not judicially estopped from taking the claim construction position it now advocates. It’s proposed claim construction is found not to be inconsistent with the position it took in previous litigation.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide