Strengthening the No Surprises Act’s Independent Dispute Resolution Process: Stakeholder Perspectives

Executive Summary -

This project was designed to collect a broad range of perspectives from stakeholders and the literature to (1) understand the current state of the implementation of the Independent Dispute Resolution (“IDR”) process, and (2) arrive at a set of productive, broadly supported recommendations—however narrow—for its reform and improvement. We interviewed stakeholders from all relevant categories involved in IDR, including providers, payers, regulators, experts, and Independent Dispute Resolution Entities (“IDREs”), with the aim of avoiding the most contentious questions under litigation and focusing on areas of potential agreement. By necessity, these areas turned out to be technical, system-focused, and incremental.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contact
more
less

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide