News & Analysis as of

Out of Network Provider

Shipman & Goodwin LLP

New Federal Regulations Strengthening Mental Health Parity Coverage

Shipman & Goodwin LLP on

On September 9, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor (the “DOL”), the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) jointly released regulations entitled “Requirements Related to...more

Goodwin

Reliance on Third-Party “Pricing” Facilitators Under Increasing Antitrust Scrutiny

Goodwin on

In the past year, healthcare systems and providers across the country have filed a series of antitrust lawsuits against MultiPlan Inc. and major US health insurers, alleging a hub-and-spoke conspiracy to fix and reduce...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Fifth Circuit Affirms Invalidity of No Surprises Regulations

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the invalidity of regulations governing the independent review process under the No Surprise Billing Rules....more

Proskauer - Health Care Law Brief

No Surprises Here!  Fifth Circuit Upholds Health Care Provider Challenge to No Surprises Act Regulations

In a recent win for health care providers, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has affirmed a lower court’s decision to vacate key portions of regulations issued by the U.S. Departments of Treasury,...more

King & Spalding

The Fifth Circuit Affirms Decision Vacating CMS Regulations Implementing the No Surprises Act IDR Process

King & Spalding on

On August 2,2024, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the vacatur of federal rulemaking related to the No Surprises Act’s (NSA) Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process. The Court held that the No Surprises Act does not permit the...more

Hall Benefits Law

9th Circuit Explains ERISA Preemption of State Law Claims Arising from Preservice Coverage Communications

Hall Benefits Law on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion with critical implications for the healthcare industry. This court decision clarifies the expansive reach of the Employee Retirement Income Security...more

Harris Beach PLLC

Court Rejects IDR Rules in No Surprises Act Case

Harris Beach PLLC on

Out-of-network health providers recently won a huge legal victory when the Fifth Circuit Court ruled that federal guidelines regarding Independent Dispute Resolution (“IDR”) proceedings were unlawfully slanted in favor of...more

Troutman Pepper

Fifth Circuit Affirms Vacatur of Insurer-Friendly "No Surprises Act" Regulations

Troutman Pepper on

In a win for health care providers, on August 2, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a Texas federal judge’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Texas Medical Association and LifeNet, an air ambulance company,...more

Proskauer - Health Care Law Brief

No Surprises Here!  Divergent Court Rulings Spotlight Ongoing Challenges in No Surprises Act Implementation; Tee Up Split in...

Two District Courts have reached opposite conclusions on the enforceability of arbitration awards under the No Surprises Act (“NSA”). The two decisions, while far from the final word on the subject, highlight the most recent...more

Napoli Shkolnik

Pricing Algorithms Help Insurers and Harm Patients

Napoli Shkolnik on

The healthcare industry grapples with a pervasive issue of providers overcharging insurers for medical procedures performed on their patients. To combat this, insurers have turned to MultiPlan—a data analytics firm that...more

Hall Benefits Law

DOL, HHS, and Treasury Release FAQs about No Surprises Act after TMA III

Hall Benefits Law on

The U.S. Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), and Treasury, along with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), released FAQs about the implementation of Title I of Division BB of the Consolidated...more

Robinson+Cole ERISA Claim Defense Blog

Ninth and Second Circuit Courts of Appeals Rule that Preauthorization Process Does Not Impose Independent Contractual Liability on...

Within days of one another, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth and Second Circuits ruled—on issues of first impression for both—that ERISA expressly preempts state law breach of contract and promissory estoppel claims...more

Troutman Pepper

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Restricts Out-of-Network Providers’ Ability to Avoid ERISA Preemption of State Law Claims

Troutman Pepper on

On May 31, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals published an opinion in Bristol SL Holdings, Inc. v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company, which has significant implications for the healthcare industry, most notably by...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

California Federal District Court Rules That AGG Clients’ Case Against Cigna for Institutional Practice of Under-Reimbursing...

U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter ruled in favor of AGG’s clients on March 18, 2024, in a case involving “matters of widescale public concern” and a strong “public interest in access” to some of Cigna’s most coveted...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Strengthening the No Surprises Act’s Independent Dispute Resolution Process: Stakeholder Perspectives

Executive Summary - This project was designed to collect a broad range of perspectives from stakeholders and the literature to (1) understand the current state of the implementation of the Independent Dispute Resolution...more

Hall Benefits Law

The No Surprises Act: A Cost Saving Opportunity for Employer Plan Sponsors

Hall Benefits Law on

Benefits costs continue to increase globally, and in the midst of high inflation and potentially a recession, executives are exploring cost effective methods to manage their self-insured health plans without compromising the...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

[Webinar] Strengthening the NSA’s Independent Dispute Resolution Process: Stakeholder Perspectives - January 18th, 1:00 pm - 2:00...

The No Surprises Act (NSA), enacted in 2020, protects patients from surprise medical bills for emergency services and, in certain circumstances, when treated by out-of-network providers in an in-network facility. Since the...more

Tucker Arensberg, P.C.

Biden Administration to Appeal Surprise Billing Defeat

Tucker Arensberg, P.C. on

As reported earlier in the MedLaw Blog (August 9, 2023), a federal District Court vacated portions of the No Surprises Act federal regulations.  Thereafter, CMS halted the arbitration process for resolving disputes regarding...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

No Surprises, But Much Uncertainty: The Status of CAA Billing Rules

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Summary - The rules in the Consolidated Appropriations Act that aim to eliminate much of the surprise from billings by out-of-network providers in particular situations are the subject of continued controversy....more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

New Mental Health Parity Guidance Creates More Work, Cost, and Risk for Plan Sponsors

Guidance on the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (the "MHPAEA") recently released by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and Treasury (the "Departments") proposes significant requirements for...more

Snell & Wilmer

2023 End-of-Year Plan Sponsor “To Do” Lists (Part 1) Health and Welfare

Snell & Wilmer on

We are pleased to present our annual End of Year Plan Sponsor “To Do” Lists. This year, we present our “To Do” Lists in four separate Employee Benefits Updates. This Part 1 covers year-end health and welfare plan issues....more

Snell & Wilmer

Enforcement Back On: Departments Rescind Enforcement Relief for Machine Readable File Requirements under Transparency in Coverage...

Snell & Wilmer on

On September 27th, the Departments released FAQs about Affordable Care Act Implementation Part 61 (“FAQ 61”), announcing that the Departments are rescinding prior-issued enforcement relief for certain machine-readable file...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

The No Surprises Act: The Departments Proposed Another Increase to IDR Fee, Will it Stick?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On September 26, 2023, the Departments of Health & Human Services (HHS), Labor, and the Treasury (collectively, the Departments) jointly proposed rules (September Rule) updating the administrative fee and Certified...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Court Rules Provider’s Prior Authorization Calls with Payor Not a Binding Contract

In a decision important to health care payors and providers alike, a California Court of Appeal, in AToN Center, Inc. v. United Healthcare Insurance Company, et al., 93 Cal.App.5th 1214 (2023), agreed with a lower court...more

Akerman LLP - Health Law Rx

THE NO SURPRISES ACT: Hoping for an End to the Surprises

By looking at the events that have transpired since the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, which includes the No Surprises Act (the Act), was signed into law, it is clear that the Departments of Health and Human Services,...more

413 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 17

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide