Supreme Court Grants Review To Consider Whether Shareholders Can Assert “Scheme” Claims Against Secondary Actors


Can shareholders of a company sue that company’s vendors, business partners, accountants, banks, or lawyers for participating in a “scheme” to issue materially misleading statements to shareholders? The Fifth and Eighth Circuit Courts of Appeal have said “no,” and the Ninth Circuit has said “sometimes.” The issue might now be settled relatively soon, because today the United States Supreme Court decided to review a case that should provide guidance on this important question. Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v.

Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., 549 U.S. ____ (U.S. 06-43 Mar. 26, 2007).

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »