The U.S. Supreme Court Confronted the Federal Securities Laws in Three Cases This Week


The U.S. Supreme Court Confronted the Federal Securities Laws in Three Cases This Week

This week, the United States Supreme Court confronted three cases that require interpretation of the federal

securities laws.

On Monday, the Supreme Court granted review in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta,

Inc., 549 U.S. ____ (U.S. 06-43 Mar. 26, 2007). In Stoneridge, the Court will determine when, if at all, a private plaintiff can bring claims under the federal securities laws against secondary actors for participating in “schemes” to defraud shareholders. A discussion of Stoneridge is included in our previous client alert linked

here. The parties will now file briefs on the merits over the summer, and oral argument before the Supreme

Court will take place next fall.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two securities cases earlier this week. One case tests the pleading and proof requirements applied in private securities class actions. The other case concerns the intersection of the antitrust and securities laws. Below, we provide commentary on both of these cases.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Antitrust & Trade Regulation Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »