In a case that could have broad implications for software patents, the Supreme Court last week held that an abstract idea does not qualify for patent protection merely by claiming that the idea can be implemented using a computer with generic hardware components. Rather, a patentee must claim “additional features” beyond generic components that transform the abstract idea into a particular application of the idea.
Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l -
In Alice Corp., the Supreme Court decided that claims directed to using a computer as an intermediary to settle financial transactions were not eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
Please see full memo below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Alice Corporation, CLS Bank, CLS Bank v Alice Corp, Mayo v. Prometheus, Patent Litigation, Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, Patents, Risk Mitigation, SCOTUS, Software
Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Shearman & Sterling LLP | Attorney Advertising