Supreme Court Overturns The Sixth Circuit Court Of Appeals: Holds Severance Payments Subject To FICA Taxes


In this e-Alert, we address the recent United States Supreme Court decision in U.S. v. Quality Stores, Inc., et al, No. 12-1408 (Sup. Ct. 03/25/2014), whereby the United States Supreme Court unanimously overturned the prior ruling made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which was previously discussed here. The stakes of this case were large as the federal government was faced with over 2,400 refund claim filings, which amounted to more than $1 billion in potential refunds to be made.

In reversing the Sixth Circuit, the Supreme Court held that severance payments which are made to involuntarily terminated employees are subject to tax under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). The Supreme Court concluded that the severance payments made by Quality Stores fell within the broad definition of "wages" for FICA tax purposes and, thus, were taxable. However, the Supreme Court did not change the IRS position that severance payments that are tied to the receipt of state unemployment benefits are not subject to FICA tax. Employers must carefully consider such arrangements to meet both the federal and state tax requirements, but with proper planning, employers and employees can jointly benefit by tying severance payments to the receipt of state unemployment benefits.

As a result of this Supreme Court decision, taxpayers who filed protective refund claims for overpaid FICA taxes in reliance on the Sixth Circuit's holding are no longer eligible to receive such refunds. Additionally, any taxpayer who relied on the Sixth Circuit's holding and did not withhold FICA taxes from severance payments may want to consider filing amended Form 941s and paying any additional tax that may be due. Taxpayers who have always treated severance payments as "wages" subject to FICA tax will see little impact from this decision.

This decision will directly implicate numerous other Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases and attendant employee bankruptcy claimants.

Further this decision will impact employer-employee negotiations for future severance packages and may well impact employment litigation settlements.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Polsinelli | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.