Supreme Court Ruling on Arizona Law Has Broad Impact


When the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling on the Arizona immigration law last week, public scrutiny of the decision was short-lived because it was eclipsed by the subsequent ruling on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

But the ruling on Arizona law was truly significant for several reasons, not the least of which is that multiple states have passed laws relating to immigration with provisions similar to that in the Arizona law.

So what did the Supreme Court really do?

First, all eight of the voting Justices (Judge Elena Kagan recused herself) agreed to uphold that portion of the law allowing police to inquire about the immigration status of a detained individual if there is reasonable suspicion that they are in the country illegally. They cited the fact that federal law requires aliens aged 14 and older to register with the U.S. government and carry registration papers if they are in the U.S. for more than 30 days.

However, the court was quick to add that “racial profiling” by police would not be tolerated, so local law enforcement must be very careful to prescribe policies and procedures that will insure non-prejudicial action in this regard.

Furthermore, the court indicated that local law enforcement would have to rely on the federal government to impose any immigration violation punishment, such as deportation. In fact, the Department of Homeland Security has made it clear that it will limit responses to local law enforcement about immigration status, sticking to the administration’s own priorities of deporting illegal immigrants who face more serious warrants on other criminal issues.

Second, the court struck down, by a 5 to 3 vote, provisions of the law that made it a state crime for illegal aliens to seek work or hold a job, indicating that this was part of the exclusive province of the federal government. This ruling could affect states with similar provisions, such as provisions for punishment of employers that hire illegal workers or that fail to use E-verify for hiring of workers.

Third, the court struck down by 5-3 vote a provision that made it a violation of state law for illegal aliens not to have federal registration cards in their possession.

If states with similar laws do not immediately revise those laws to be consistent with the Supreme Court’s ruling, there could be more litigation coming in the next term.

We generally do not handle deportation matters, but if you are in need of legal assistance with another immigration matter, do not hesitate to contact our office at (847) 564-0712 to speak with a qualified attorney. You can also check out our immigration law Website for more information about how we might assist you.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ronald Shapiro | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Ronald Shapiro on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.