This week, the Supreme Court ruled that the United States Forest Service could not construct a trail on an abandoned railroad right of way (ROW) that crosses through private property. Brandt v. United States, No. 12-1173, 2014 WL 901843 (U.S. Mar. 10, 2014). This ruling represents a major shift regarding the appropriate use of rights of way and has a strong potential to spur thousands of landowner lawsuits all across the country.
The decision is being hailed by property rights activists as a major victory, but Justice Sotomayor, the sole dissenting justice, warned that the majority’s ruling will be extremely disruptive to the historical use of abandoned railroad ROWs, stating that: “since 1903, this Court has held that rights of way were granted to railroads with an implied possibility of reverter to the United States . . . By changing course today, the Court undermines the legality of thousands of miles of former rights of way that the public now enjoys as means of transportation and recreation. And lawsuits challenging the conversion of former rails to recreational trails alone may well cost the American taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.” Brandt, 2014 WL 901843, at *15 (U.S. Mar. 10, 2014) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Brandt Irrevocable Trust v Us, Eminent Domain, Railroads, Railways, SCOTUS, Takings
Published In: Commercial Real Estate Updates, Residential Real Estate Updates, Transportation Updates, Zoning, Planning & Land Use Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck | Attorney Advertising