Supreme Court Will Decide If Statistical Significance Forms Part of the Legal Standard for Proving Securities Fraud Against Life Science Companies

more+
less-
more+
less-
Explore:  Life Sciences SCOTUS

Statistical significance is generally cited as the gold standard by which pharmaceutical companies decide whether information is scientifically meaningful. Should it also be part of the legal standard for proving securities fraud under the federal securities laws? The United States Supreme Court will resolve that question in its next term, which starts in October 2010.

On Monday, June 14, 2010, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano, No. 09-1156, to decide: “Whether a plaintiff can state a claim under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5 based on a pharmaceutical company’s nondisclosure of adverse event reports even though the reports are not alleged to be statistically significant.”

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Life Sciences, SCOTUS

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates, Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »