Sutherland Salt Shaker -- Vol. 2, No. 9, November 2011


In This Issue:

Waiving the Baton: Louisiana Court of Appeal Rules No Nexus for Passive Limited Partner; Virginia Taxpayer Fails to Follow Procedure: Must Add Back (At Least for Now); Indiana Combination Is Last Resort; Massachusetts Appellate Tax Board Applies Wicked Mad Scrutiny to Taxpayer’s Intercompany Interest Expense; These Cases Tried to Go to the U.S. Supreme Court, But the Court Said “No…No…Oh?”; Who Lost the Remote?: Virginia Disallowed Losses and Combined Reporting; MORE “and” LESS Unclaimed Property: North Carolina’s Grab for More Information and Delaware’s Shrinking Look Back Period; Nexus? Who said Anything about Nexus?: A Summary of the Federal Nexus Bills; Giving Taxpayers the Business on the FTB’s Application of the Factor-Presence Nexus Provision; and New York Attempts to Take Taxpayer Out Behind the (Kell)Woodshed.

Excerpt from Waiving the Baton: Louisiana Court of Appeal Rules No

Nexus for Passive Limited Partner:

The Louisiana Court of Appeal recently ruled that a corporation’s passive ownership interest in a limited partnership doing business in Louisiana is not sufficient to create Louisiana corporate franchise tax nexus. Utelcom, Inc. v. Bridges, Dkt. No. 535,407 (Division “D”, Ct. App., First Dist., Sept. 12, 2011). The court held that because capital contributed to a limited partnership is no longer owned or used by the contributing partner, an ownership interest in the partnership does not create franchise tax nexus.

The Louisiana Department of Revenue issued a corporate franchise tax assessment against two out-of-state corporate limited partners. The limited partnership was engaged in the business of long-distance telecommunications in Louisiana. The Department asserted that the corporations were subject to tax because they acted in unison with the general partner to conduct business through the limited partners’ capital contributions. The trial court upheld the assessment based on a Louisiana regulation, which provided that mere ownership of property in Louisiana through a partnership creates franchise tax nexus over an out-of-state corporation.

Please see full newsletter below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.