The Broadening Applicability of Issue Estoppel


The Court of Appeal’s decision in Penner v. Regional Municipality of Niagara Regional Police Services Board et al. (reserved at the Supreme Court, January 11, 2012) gives support for a broader application of issue estoppel. In this case, the Court of Appeal held that findings made in a police Disciplinary Hearing precluded re-litigating those same issues in a civil action.

The appellant (Mr. Penner) was arrested during a courtroom disturbance in the Ontario Court of Justice. He alleged misconduct by the police officers who arrested him, claiming the arrest was unlawful and that the officers used unnecessary force. After proceedings at the Police Disciplinary Hearing and the Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services, the Divisional Court upheld the original Hearing Officer’s decision dismissing Mr. Penner’s complaints.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  False Imprisonment, Issue Estoppel, Malicious Prosecution, Standard of Proof, Unlawful Arrest

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Personal Injury Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Lerners LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »