Originally published in Insurance Law360 - December 5, 2011.
These days, no one is surprised to see a bad faith expert listed on expert designations in insurance coverage litigation involving allegations of bad faith. While lawyers on both sides of the dispute routinely engage bad faith experts, there is still uncertainty regarding the proper scope of a bad faith expert’s testimony.
The United States Supreme Court first examined the admissibility of “expert” testimony in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 590 (1993). Daubert established that the trial judge must act as a “gatekeeper” by ensuring that an expert’s testimony is based on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the question before the trier of fact.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Civil Procedure Updates, Insurance Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Zelle Hofmann Voelbel & Mason LLP | Attorney Advertising