The U.S. Supreme Court, in Overturning Section 3 of DOMA, Creates Issues for Benefit Plans

more+
less-

The U.S. Supreme Court, in Overturning Section 3 of DOMA, Creates Issues for Benefit Plans

by Gary S. Young on July 23, 2013

Historically, the definition and regulation of the marriage relationship was deemed to be the exclusive domain of the states. With passage of the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (“DOMA”), Congress changed this assumption in two important respects:

• DOMA Section 2 permitted states to refuse to recognize same-gender marriages performed under the laws of other states; and

• DOMA Section 3 barred same-gender married couples from being recognized as “spouses” for all purposes of Federal law.

In United States v. Windsor (Case No. 12–30, decided June 26, 2013), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that DOMA’s definition of “spouse” (DOMA Section 3) is unconstitutional “as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment.”

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Rights Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Family Law Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Gary Young, Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »