The U.S. Supreme Court, in Overturning Section 3 of DOMA, Creates Issues for Benefit Plans

more+
less-

The U.S. Supreme Court, in Overturning Section 3 of DOMA, Creates Issues for Benefit Plans

by Gary S. Young on July 23, 2013

Historically, the definition and regulation of the marriage relationship was deemed to be the exclusive domain of the states. With passage of the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (“DOMA”), Congress changed this assumption in two important respects:

• DOMA Section 2 permitted states to refuse to recognize same-gender marriages performed under the laws of other states; and

• DOMA Section 3 barred same-gender married couples from being recognized as “spouses” for all purposes of Federal law.

In United States v. Windsor (Case No. 12–30, decided June 26, 2013), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that DOMA’s definition of “spouse” (DOMA Section 3) is unconstitutional “as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment.”

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Gary Young, Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×