Third Circuit Holds That a Court, Not an Arbitrator, Must Decide Whether an Arbitration Agreement Authorizes Class-wide Arbitration

Who decides whether an arbitration agreement allows for class-wide arbitration — a court or an arbitrator? In the wake of mixed signals from the U.S. Supreme Court, lower courts have been reluctant to answer this question. However, on July 30, 2014, in Opalinski v. Robert Half International, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit became the second federal court of appeals to definitively hold that the availability of class-wide arbitration is a threshold question for the court, not a subsidiary question for the arbitrator.

The plaintiffs in Opalinski signed employment agreements with Robert Half International (RHI) that contained arbitration provisions requiring that “[a]ny dispute or claim arising out of or relating to Employee’s employment, termination of employment or any provision of this Agreement” be submitted to arbitration. Neither agreement mentioned class-wide arbitration. The plaintiffs brought a putative class action against RHI in federal district court, asserting claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. RHI moved to compel arbitration on an individual basis. The district court granted the motion in part, compelling arbitration but holding that the arbitrator must decide whether class-wide or individual arbitration was proper. The arbitrator subsequently entered an award in the plaintiffs’ favor and ruled that the employment agreements allowed for class-wide arbitration. RHI filed a motion to vacate the award, which the district court denied.

Please see Full Alert below for more Information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Arbitration, Arbitration Agreements, Arbitrators, Class Action, Class Action Arbitration Waivers, Robert Half, SCOTUS

Published In: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Labor & Employment Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »