Uniwest: Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Down Overly Broad Indemnity


Code § 11-4.1 of the Virginia Code renders some contract indemnity provisions invalid. This statute invalidates all contractual provisions under which a party is indemnified from liability “caused by or resulting solely from the negligence of the other party.” In other words, Virginia prohibits Party A from indemnifying Party B for damages caused by Party B’s own negligence. Recently, the Supreme Court of Virginia applied this Code restriction to invalidate a broad indemnity obligation of a subcontract because it was so broad as to include the prohibited indemnity. Notably, the Court invalidated the entire provision, not just the overly broad portions, and even though the particular circumstances at issue indicated that the accident was not the sole fault of one party. The validity of an indemnity provision is to be determined by its language, not the circumstances from which the claim arose.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: General Business Updates, Construction Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Chandra Lantz, Hirschler Fleischer | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »