White Collar Watch - May 2012



- Superman Case Unable to Save Selective Waiver Theory pages 1 - 3

In In re Pacific Pictures Corp., No. 11-71844, 2012 WL 1293534 (9th Cir. Apr. 17, 2012), a dispute concerning royalties derived from the character of Superman, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals joined a majority of circuit courts eliminating the possibility of selective waiver. The theory of selective waiver would allow a party to claim attorney-client privilege, where applicable, over a document that it had previously produced to the government. Generally, voluntarily producing the document as part of a government investigation would constitute waiver of any privilege attached to that document, and the party could be forced to produce it in subsequent civil litigation. Under selective waiver, though, a party is free to produce documents to the government, and gain credibility through cooperation, without risking possible exposure in future civil litigation. The only federal court of appeals to recognize selective waiver is the Eighth Circuit. Its failure to gain wider acceptance means that businesses in highly-regulated industries must consider all collateral consequences when deciding what, if any, privilege to waive when responding to government subpoenas....

- The D.C. Circuit Empowers Relators in Qui Tam Actions in United States ex rel. Schweizer v. Océ N.V. pages 3 - 4

As discussed in the March 2012 edition of the White Collar Watch, the case of United States ex rel. Schweizer v. Océ N.V. highlights the tension between the interests of qui tam relators and the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) when it comes to settling qui tam actions. As of our March edition, the case was pending before the Court of Appeals of the D.C. Circuit on the question whether the DOJ could settle a qui tam action over the objection of a relator without the court reviewing the reasonableness of the settlement agreement. On April 20, 2012, the D.C. Circuit held that the DOJ could not exercise unfettered discretion. Lower courts must examine the reasonableness of a settlement agreement reached in a qui tam action. See United States ex rel. Schweizer v. Océ N.V., No. 11-7030, 2012 WL 1372219 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 20, 2012)....

Please see full newsletter below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Saul Ewing LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Saul Ewing LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.