Schedule UTP: Another Taxpayer Transparency Requirement


Since 2002, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and financial statement initiatives have increased the number and detail of disclosures that must be made by large corporate taxpayers. The recently released final Schedule UTP requires large corporate taxpayers to disclose information about their uncertain tax positions. This adds yet another required disclosure, one which has implications for the IRS’s historic “policy of restraint” regarding taxpayers’ analysis and judgment concerning their tax positions as reflected in their tax accrual workpapers.

Tax Accrual Workpapers and the Policy of Restraint

Historically, the IRS has applied a policy of restraint with respect to tax accrual workpapers, which are developed by a taxpayer and its auditor and support the tax reserve provision on a taxpayer’s financial statements. In an early decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld an IRS demand for a taxpayer’s tax accrual workpapers, holding that the workpapers were not protected by the attorney-client privilege or the work product doctrine. See United States v. El Paso Co., 682 F.2d 530, 534 n.3 (5th Cir. 1982).

Two years later, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Arthur Young v. United States, 465 U.S. 805 (1984), that the IRS had the right to demand the taxpayer’s accountant’s workpapers. Due to concerns regarding the impact of the Arthur Young decision on the integrity of the financial statement audit process, the IRS announced shortly thereafter that it would not request tax accrual workpapers except in certain limited circumstances. Because tax accrual workpapers provide a roadmap to the taxpayer’s judgment on its tax positions, routine IRS requests for such workpapers created unease regarding the taxpayer’s willingness to be forthright with its auditor about its tax position. Between 1984 and 2002, the IRS requested tax accrual workpapers in only a handful of cases.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.