Big News in Arbitration: Sonic-Calabasas v. Moreno and AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion


In the landmark 2000 case of Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.1 the California Supreme Court made it clear that employers could require employees to submit statutory claims to arbitration, provided certain minimal standards of fairness were met. The court specifically ruled that a claim of violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) could be the subject of a mandatory arbitration provision, so long as there was no waiver of statutory rights and the terms of the arbitration agreement were not otherwise unconscionable.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© JAMS | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


JAMS on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.