Big News in Arbitration: Sonic-Calabasas v. Moreno and AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion

JAMS
Contact

In the landmark 2000 case of Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.1 the California Supreme Court made it clear that employers could require employees to submit statutory claims to arbitration, provided certain minimal standards of fairness were met. The court specifically ruled that a claim of violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) could be the subject of a mandatory arbitration provision, so long as there was no waiver of statutory rights and the terms of the arbitration agreement were not otherwise unconscionable.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

JAMS
Contact
more
less

JAMS on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide