Victor Stanley v. Creative Pipe: New Breakthrough Opinion Sheds Light on Serious Dangers of Destroying Electronic Evidence

Miller & Martin PLLC
Contact

A Magistrate Judge for the U.S. District Court in Maryland imposed heavy sanctions on a litigant last week after finding he had intentionally destroyed electronic evidence in defiance of repeated orders not to do so. In an 89-page attack, Judge Paul Grimm held Mark Pappas – the President of Creative Pipe, Inc. – liable for civil contempt, and ordered that he be placed in prison for up to two years unless he pays plaintiff’s costs and fees associated with claims for spoliation of evidence.

In Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc., plaintiff Victor Stanley sued Creative Pipe and Pappas on claims of patent infringement, copyright infringement, and unfair competition, alleging that several designs had been stolen off its web site. Then the discovery infractions began. In 2008, already more than a year into the litigation, Judge Grimm issued an opinion holding that the defendants had waived the attorney-client and work-product protections after they inadvertently produced more than 150 electronically-stored documents during initial discovery.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Miller & Martin PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Miller & Martin PLLC
Contact
more
less

Miller & Martin PLLC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide