What’s Driving the US Antitrust Agencies?

more+
less-

As antitrust veterans know, no matter how much a new administration may want to change how antitrust is enforced, the bulk of the agencies’ enforcement agenda remains relatively constant from one administration to the next. Overheated rhetoric notwithstanding, most enforcement decisions are driven by the application of widely shared principles to the facts, with the result that the cases that get brought (or not) usually have more to do with the course of events – what deals are proposed, what misconduct detected – than the agencies’ current enforcement agenda.

Over time, however, trends emerge. With two years of Obama administration antitrust enforcement now on display, we have a sufficient record on which to draw some reliable conclusions about what makes this administration’s approach to antitrust enforcement different, and what those differences portend for the next few years.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Antitrust & Trade Regulation Updates, Elections & Politics Updates, Mergers & Acquisitions Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »