Are Georgia-Pacific's Paper Towel Lawsuits All Wet?


There has been a fair amount of ink spilled in the IP blogosphere about last month's Georgia Pacific v. Von Drehle opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. This is one of several cases that Georgia-Pacific has brought to stop the "stuffing" of off-brand (i.e. non-Georgia-Pacific brand) paper towels in GP's proprietary enMotion® paper towel dispensers.

As the Fourth Circuit's opinion describes it, Georgia-Pacific is basically attempting to establish a business model in the hand sanitation market much like how soft drinks are sold in the fast food and foodservice channels: lease the equipment to distributors and end-users, and require that only the lessor's product be distributed in the leased equipment. In other words, when you walk up to a self-serve soda fountain that has a Pepsi logo, you expect that it will dispense Pepsi® cola.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.