Pennsylvania lawyers must be alert to situations in which they may waive their appellate rights, especially where the requirements for preserving those rights are murky. One of those murky areas in the Pennsylvania state courts involves a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) if the plaintiff prevails at trial.
Is filing a motion for a compulsory non-suit at the end of the plaintiff’s case sufficient to preserve such a claim, or must the defendant file a motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence, as is required in federal court? In a recent opinion, a panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court held that the right to seek JNOV was preserved by the filing of a motion for compulsory non-suit, even though the defendant apparently did not move for a directed verdict. Youst v. Keck’s Food Service, Inc., 2014 PA Super 121 (June 11, 2014).
Please see Full Alert below for more Information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.