Latest on Condemnation of Fixtures in Virginia: Taco Bell v Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner

Sands Anderson PC
Contact

On June 9, 2011, the Virginia Supreme Court held that whether equipment within a condemned business is personal property (therefore not valued as part of the take) or a fixture (therefore valued as part of the take) is a question for the condemnation jury, not the trial court. The holding was the crux of its opinion in a Virginia Department of Transportation condemnation case, Taco Bell of America, Inc. v. Commonwealth Transportation Commissioner of Virginia.

The import of the opinion is being hotly debated in the press and elsewhere. However, the Supreme Court’s opinion was quite limited.

Supreme Court opinion did not alter the test in Virginia for determining whether equipment is fixtures in Virginia. Rather, the opinion quoted and applied the long-standing test in Virginia for determining whether equipment is considered fixtures from Danville Holding Corp. v. Clement, 178 Va. 223, 16 S.E.2d 345 (1941).

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sands Anderson PC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Sands Anderson PC
Contact
more
less

Sands Anderson PC on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide