SUMMARY: A child pornography suspect had no constitutionally protected privacy right in the files found on his personal computer, accessible by a neighbor who was piggybacking on his unsecured wireless network.
"As a result of the ease and frequency with which people use others' wireless networks, I conclude that society recognizes a lower expectation of privacy in information broadcast via an unsecured wireless network router than in information transmitted through a hardwired network or password-protected network."
Doc Type:
Decision
Filed: 1/27/2010
Legal Document Name:
U.S. v. Ahrndt
Court Decision on Fourth Amendment and Open Wi-Fi Hotspots
Jurisdiction: Federal, 9th Circuit, Oregon
Legal System: United States