Green Party v. Garfield

U.S. District Court Decision in Green Party v. Garfield on the validity of Conn.'s pay-to-play law


In this decision, the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut upheld Connecticut's pay-to-play contribution ban and granted summary judgment to the state.

The court applied less exacting scrutiny than in political expenditure cases because the activity involved pertained to contributions, not expenditures, and thus was closer to the edge than the core of the First Amendment.

The court found the pay-to-play and accompanying lobbying contribution and solicitation bans to be narrowly tailored to prevent corruption or the appearance of corruption, which, the court said, was significant given Connecticut's recent history with corruption at the highest levels of state government.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Decision | Federal, 2nd Circuit, Connecticut | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Doug Cornelius | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Doug Cornelius on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.