Sparking a divide in defining ‘damage’ in business interruption claims? Mainstream Aquaculture Pty Ltd v Calliden Insurance Ltd [2011] VSC 286

International Lawyers Network
Contact

The concept of ‘damage’ is fundamental to business interruption insurance because without it there is often no cover. A broad approach to what constitutes ‘damage’ can therefore have a significant impact on the scope of such policies.

The Victorian Supreme Court has generally adopted a wide interpretation of the term ‘damage’. In a recent decision ‘damage’ was held to include a tripped fuse located on the site of another business that stopped electricity from being supplied to the plaintiff’s business, causing loss.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

International Lawyers Network
Contact
more
less

International Lawyers Network on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide