Barger & Wolen

633 West 5th Street Forty-Seventh Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2043, United States

Contact: Heather Milligan

  • (213) 680-2800
  • (213) 614-7399

New California Law Imposes Liability On Companies Where Labor Contractors Fail To Pay Wages Or Provide Workers’ Compensation Insurance

On Sunday, September 28, 2014, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law AB 1897 (D-Hernandez), which imposes liability on companies who use subcontracted temporary labor if the temp company fails to pay wages or provide…more
| Labor & Employment Law, Worker’s Compensation

Is an independent lawsuit required to fix amount of attorney's fee lien?

In Mojtahedi v. Vargas the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District decided a unique issue pertaining to the procedure for enforcing an attorney fees lien against the attorney who is hired to replace the…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies

Burden of Proof: The "What Changed?" Argument from "A Medley of Interesting Disability Cases"

Hegger v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28587 (N.D. Cal. 2013) - Facts and holding: Plaintiff Tami Hegger (“Hegger”) was employed as a medical device sales representative until she left work in…more
| Civil Procedure, Labor & Employment Law, Insurance

Hold the cellphone! Who pays if it’s work?

In an August 19, 2014, Daily Journal article, Hold the cellphone! Who pays if it’s work?, Michael Newman writes about a recent California appellate opinion providing employers insight into how they should reimburse employees for…more
| Labor & Employment Law

Must Employers Reimburse Employees For Work Calls On Private Cell Phones?

In Cochran v. Schwan’s Home Service, Inc., the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District dealt with the question of whether employers are required to reimburse employees for work-related calls made on their…more
| Civil Remedies, Labor & Employment Law

Court decides when statute of limitations for "wrongful act or omission" against counsel begins

In Lee v. Hanley the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District decided an issue concerning the interpretation of the one-year statute of limitations relating to allegations of wrongdoing in the performance of attorney…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Professional Malpractice

Timing of judgment creditor's entitled fee petition key to enforcement

In Conservatorship of McQueen the California Supreme Court decided a unique issue concerning the interpretation of Code of Civil Procedure Section 685.040. Under that statute, a judgment creditor is entitled to the reasonable…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Personal Injury, Business Torts, Wills, Trusts, & Estate Planning

Trial Court's Calculation of Lodestar Is Affirmed

In Syers Properties III, Inc. v. Rankin the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District affirmed the trial court’s grant of an award of attorney fees. The appellant contended that the trial court should not have…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Remedies, Construction Law, Professional Malpractice

Standard for Class Certification of Independent Contractors Clarified by California Supreme Court

In Ayala v. Antelope Valley Newspapers, the California Supreme Court held that the proper test for determining whether newspaper carriers could proceed as a class on the issue of their employment status was the employer’s right…more
| Civil Procedure, Commercial Law & Contracts, Labor & Employment Law

California Insurers Asked to Submit Diversity Information About Boards of Directors

The California Department of Insurance (“CDI”) has issued a notification to insurers with 2013 written premiums of $100 million or more in California to complete and submit the CDI’s Governing Board Diversity Survey…more
| Commercial Law & Contracts, Insurance

Unauthorized Work Status Does Not Bar Discrimination Claims

In Salas v. Sierra Chemical Co., the California Supreme Court held that an undocumented worker who was wrongfully terminated in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) may be awarded lost pay damages,…more
| Civil Remedies, Civil Rights, Conflict of Laws, Labor & Employment Law, Immigration Law

After NLRB v. Canning: A Practical Guide For Employers

The Supreme Court’s decision last week in NLRB v. Canning left many employers scratching their heads – and with good reason. Sure, the unanimous ruling served as a rebuke to the Obama Administration, and hundreds of…more
| Constitutional Law, Elections & Politics, Labor & Employment Law

Recent Victory on Behalf of Medical Supplement Insurers against California Department of Insurance

As a result of the filing of a Writ of Mandate and Declaratory Relief Action by Barger & Wolen LLP Senior Regulatory Counsel Robert W. Hogeboom and Litigation Partner John Holmes, the California Department of Insurance (“CDI”)…more
| Civil Remedies, Health, Insurance

Supreme Court Strikes NLRB Recess Appointments

The United States Supreme Court has struck down President Obama’s controversial 2012 nominations to the NLRB, holding that the President violated the Constitution by using his recess appointments power when the Senate was still…more
| Constitutional Law, Elections & Politics, Labor & Employment Law

Age Discrimination No Longer Requires Proof of Younger Replacement

In EEOC v. Lehi Roller Mills Co., the United States District Court for the District of Utah held that a plaintiff alleging age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) need not show that he…more
| Civil Procedure, Civil Rights, Labor & Employment Law
Showing 1-15 of 709 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 48
Areas of Practice
  • Appellate Practice
  • Insurance
  • Litigation
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • California
  • New York
Other Countries
  • United Kingdom
Number of Attorneys

50-100 Attorneys

This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.