Lawrence M. Sung

Lawrence M. Sung

BakerHostetler


Latest Publications

Share:

Patent Watch: Ass'n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.

A naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but cDNA is patent eligible because it is not naturally occurring....more

6/15/2013 - AMP v Myriad Biotechnology BRCA DNA Human Genes Myriad Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents SCOTUS

Patent Watch: Organic Seed Growers & Trade Ass'n v. Monsanto Co.

"[Where the court relies on a patent holder's] representations to defeat [jurisdiction over the declaratory judgment claims], those representations are binding as a matter of judicial estoppel [even in the absence of a...more

6/13/2013 - Genetically Engineered Seed Judicial Estoppel Monsanto Noninfringement Organic Seed Growers & Trade Assn Patents

Patent Watch: InterDigital Commc'ns, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n

"[A]n ITC order terminating an investigation on the basis of an arbitration agreement [is] an appealable final determination under 19 U.S.C. § 1337(c) [over which the Federal Circuit has] jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §...more

6/12/2013 - Arbitration Arbitration Agreements Investigations ITC Patents

Patent Watch: Regents of the Univ. of Minn. v. AGA Med. Corp.

In disclaiming claim coverage in light of certain prior art, the applicant does not thereby act as a lexicographer, redefining individual words....more

6/5/2013 - Medical Devices Patent Applications Patents Prior Art USPTO

Patent Watch: Ateliers de la Haute-Garonne v. Broetje Automation USA Inc.

"There is no requirement in 35 USC 112 that an applicant point out which of his embodiments he considers his best mode; that the disclosure includes the best mode contemplated by the applicant is enough to satisfy the...more

5/24/2013 - Best Mode Requirement Inventors Patent Applications Patents

Patent Watch: Forrester Envtl. Servs., Inc. v. Wheelabrator Techs., Inc.

[P]ermitting state courts to adjudicate disparagement cases (involving alleged false statements about U.S. patent rights) could result in inconsistent judgments between state and federal courts [but] this possibility of...more

5/22/2013 - Claim Construction Disparagement Infringement Jurisdiction Patents

Patent Watch: Dey, L.P. v. Sunovion Pharms., Inc.

“[A]n agreement of confidentiality, or circumstances creating a similar expectation of secrecy, may negate a ‘public use’ where there is not commercial exploitation” [even] when an unaffiliated third party is responsible for...more

5/22/2013 - Confidentiality Agreements Patents Pharmaceutical Pharmaceutical Patents Prescription Drugs Public Use

Patent Watch: Alexsam, Inc. v. IDT Corp.

Expert testimony [may be] required not only to explain what the prior art references disclosed, but also to show that a person skilled in the art would have been motivated to combine them in order to achieve the claimed...more

5/22/2013 - Expert Testimony Obviousness Patents Prior Art Rule 37

Patent Watch: Aventis Pharms., Inc. v. Amino Chems. Ltd.

"[T]he same claim term can have different constructions depending upon the context of how the term is used within the claims and specification."...more

5/22/2013 - Contract Interpretation Patents

Patent Watch: Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Genentech, Inc.

On May 10, 2013, in Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Genentech, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Rader, Dyk, Reyna*) affirmed the district court's denial of Genentech's motion to enjoin Sanofi from...more

5/16/2013 - Arbitration Foreign Jurisdictions Forum Selection Clause Genentech Injunctions Licenses Patents

Patent Watch: Motiva, LLC. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n

The "Commission is fundamentally a trade forum, not an intellectual property forum" [and] litigation expenses directed at preventing, instead of encouraging manufacture of, articles incorporating patented technology does not...more

5/15/2013 - Domestic Industry Requirement ITC Patents

Patent Watch: CLS Bank Int'l v. Alice Corp.

[T]hough much is published today discussing the proper approach to the patent eligibility inquiry, nothing said today beyond our judgment has the weight of precedent....more

5/15/2013 - CLS Bank CLS Bank v Alice Corp Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents

Patent Watch: Bowman v. Monsanto Co.

On May 13, 2013, in Bowman v. Monsanto Co., the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Federal Circuit's affirmance of the district court's judgment that Bowman infringed U.S. Patents No. 5,352,605 and No. RE39,247, which related to...more

5/14/2013 - Bowman v Monsanto Genetically Engineered Seed Infringement Monsanto Patent Exhaustion Patents SCOTUS

Patent Watch: Baron Servs., Inc. v. Media Weather Innovations, LLC

On May 7, 2013, in Baron Servs., Inc. v. Media Weather Innovations, LLC, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Dyk, Reyna, Prost*) vacated and remanded the district court's summary judgment that MWI did not...more

5/9/2013 - Discovery Infringement Patents Summary Judgment

Patent Watch: Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.

On May 1, 2013, in Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Dyk, Prost,* O'Malley) affirmed-in-part and reversed-in-part the district court's judgment that U.S. Patents No. 7,642,258,...more

5/8/2013 - Allergan Inc Allergan v Sandoz Combination Products Obviousness Patents

Patent Watch: Versata Software, Inc. v. SAP Am., Inc.

On May 1, 2013, in Versata Software, Inc. v. SAP Am., Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Rader,* Prost, Moore) affirmed-in-part, vacated-in-part and remanded-in-part the district court's judgment that...more

5/7/2013 - Damages Infringement Injunctions Jury Awards Lost Profits Patents

Patent Watch: Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc.

On April 26, 2013, in Biosig Instruments, Inc. v. Nautilus, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Newman, Schall, Wallach*) reversed and remanded the district court's summary judgment that U.S. Patent No....more

4/29/2013 - Claim Construction Indefiniteness Medical Devices Patents

Patent Watch: Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Zenni Optical, LLC

On April 19, 2013, in Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Zenni Optical, LLC, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Newman,* Prost, Reyna) affirmed the district court's ruling that prior litigation collaterally estopped Aspex...more

4/24/2013 - Claim Preclusion Collateral Estoppel Fashion Industry Infringement Patents

Patent Watch: Lazare Kaplan Int'l, Inc. v. Photoscribe Techs., Inc.

On April 19, 2013, in Lazare Kaplan Int'l, Inc. v. Photoscribe Techs., Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Lourie,* Dyk, Reyna) reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part and remanded the district court's summary...more

4/23/2013 - Claim Construction Infringement Patent Validity Patents USPTO

Patent Watch: Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. Watson Pharm., Inc.

On April 16, 2013, in Bayer Schering Pharma AG v. Watson Pharm., Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Lourie,* Schall, Prost) reversed the district court's summary judgment that U.S. Reissue Patent No....more

4/19/2013 - Bayer Patents Pharmaceutical Prescription Drugs Prior Art

Patent Watch: Saffran v. Johnson & Johnson

On April 4, 2013, in Saffran v. Johnson & Johnson, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Lourie,* Moore, O'Malley) reversed the district court's judgment that Johnson & Johnson and Cordis Corp. infringed U.S....more

4/10/2013 - Disclaimers Infringement Medical Devices Patents Prior Art

Patent Watch: In Re Morsa

On April 5, 2013, in In re Morsa, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Rader, Lourie, O'Malley*) affirmed-in-part, vacated-in-part and remanded the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences decision...more

4/10/2013 - Enablement Inquiries Interference Proceeding Patents Prior Art USPTO

Patent Watch: Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int'l, Inc.

On March 26, 2013, in Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int'l, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Lourie, O'Malley, Reyna*) affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part and...more

3/29/2013 - Damages Infringement Mobile Devices Patents

Patent Watch: In re Owens

On March 26, 2013, in In re Owens, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Prost,* Moore, Wallach) affirmed the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences decision upholding the patent examiner's rejection of...more

3/29/2013

Patent Watch: Dawson v. Dawson

On March 25, 2013, in Dawson v. Dawson, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Reyna, Bryson,* Wallach) affirmed the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences decision that awarded priority of invention to...more

3/27/2013

×

Expand Your Reach

JD Supra gets your content noticed, increases your visibility and makes your marketing efforts hassle free...

Learn More  or  Schedule a demo