On March 6, the Missouri Supreme Court declined to review the intermediate appellate court’s decision in Fox v. Johnson & Johnson, which vacated a $72 million talc verdict awarded in St. Louis City Court. ...more
3/13/2018
/ General Jurisdiction ,
Hazardous Substances ,
Johnson & Johnson ,
Judicial Review ,
Mass Tort Litigation ,
MO Supreme Court ,
Personal Care Products ,
Personal Jurisdiction ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Popular ,
Specific Jurisdiction ,
State of Incorporation ,
Toxic Exposure ,
Vacated
Companies facing "take-home" asbestos or other toxic tort exposure claims in Arizona, or in other jurisdictions applying Arizona law, now have a new case to cite in dispositive motions. With the Sept. 20 Arizona Court of...more
9/29/2016
/ Appeals ,
Asbestos ,
Asbestos Litigation ,
Duty of Care ,
Hazardous Substances ,
Mesothelioma ,
Motion for Summary Judgment ,
Negligence ,
Take-Home Exposure ,
Toxic Exposure ,
Workplace Hazards
On March 2, 2016, the Indiana Supreme Court struck down Section 2 of the Indiana Product Liability Act and held that its statute of repose “does not apply to cases involving protracted exposure to an inherently dangerous...more