Duty of Care

News & Analysis as of

SCC Recognizes a Lawyer’s Duty of Commitment to the Client’s Cause

In a decision released on Friday, the Supreme Court of Canada has recognized a new principle of fundamental justice: a lawyer’s duty of commitment to the client’s cause. In Canada (Attorney General) v Federation of...more

Release of Liability Agreement Extinguishes Duty of Ordinary Care

On January 27, 2015, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, in Eriksson v. Nunnink (Case No. E057158), held a release of liability between Decedent and Defendant was enforceable as a defense to the...more

Illinois Supreme Court Debates Scope of Tort Duty for Insurance Agents

Last week, the Illinois Supreme Court began hearing arguments from its civil docket with Skaperdas v. Country Casualty Insurance Company. Skaperdas poses a major question for the insurance industry: does a “captive”...more

UK: Media – Sotheby’s auction house wins High Court battle over ‘Caravaggio’ painting

A claim for compensation against Sotheby’s auction house over the sale of a disputed ‘Caravaggio’ painting has been thrown out of the High Court...more

A Few Thoughts on The Financial Advisor as Fiduciary, 2015

I was speaking at an event for hedge fund managers the other day to introduce my new book, the Ultimate Guide to The Investment Advisers Act, a Practitioner’s Guide. Dodd Frank introduced many changes to the existing rules...more

California Appellate Court Upholds Bar to Liability by Premises Owners for Secondary Exposure

In Wanda Beckering v. Shell Oil Company, 2014 WL 6611088, the Second District of the California Court of Appeal affirmed the granting of summary judgment in favor of defendant Shell Oil Company, finding that the plaintiff was...more

Torts – Negligence – Assumption of the Risk

Tanya Honeycutt v. Meridian Sports Club, LLC - Court Of Appeal, Second Appellate District (November 6, 2014) - The primary assumption of the risk doctrine has been used by courts to provide immunity from suit...more

High Court Restricts Common Law Duty Of Care Where Hospitals/ Doctors Have Statutory Obligation To Discharge From Involuntary...

HUNTER AND NEW ENGLAND LOCAL HEALTH DISTRICT V MCKENNA [2014] HCA 44 - On 12 November 2014, the High Court of Australia unanimously held that a hospital and a doctor did not owe a duty of care to the relatives of a man...more

Illinois Supreme Court Agrees to Decide Whether Fire District Owed Tort Duty to 911 Caller

In the closing days of its September term, the Illinois Supreme Court agreed to decide a question of potentially great import for Illinois first responders: do public entities and their employees owe a tort duty of care to...more

Bank That Accepted Stolen and Forged Checks From Check-Cashing Company Had Duty of Care to Verify Endorsements

Addressing an issue of first impression, the California Fourth Appellate District has decided that a check cashing service is not a bank for purposes of the fraudulent indorsement provisions of Section 3405 of the California...more

High Court finds no duty of care

In Hunter and New England Local Health District v McKenna; Hunter and New England Local Health District v Simon & Anor [2014] HCA 44, the High Court unanimously allowed appeals from the New South Wales Court of Appeal, and...more

Nevada’s Duty Of Care Standard Fails To Win Summary Judgment For Director

NRS 78.138(1) imposes two explicit duties on directors in the exercise of their powers: they must act in good faith and with a view to the interests of the corporation. This contrasts with Delaware case law which speaks of a...more

Banking Disputes Quarterly - Q3 2014

DLA Piper’s Banking & Finance Litigation team welcomes you to our quarterly round-up, designed to keep you informed of the latest news and legal developments, and to let you know about future developments that may affect your...more

Disciplinary Proceedings and the Duty of Care

In Coventry University v Mian [2014] EWCA Civ 1275, the Court of Appeal considered whether an employer had breached its duty of care by commencing disciplinary action against an employee on the basis of a preliminary, rather...more

High Court Clarifies Duties To Subsequent Purchasers – Brookfield Multiplex v Owners Corporation

The duty of care owed by a builder to subsequent purchasers of a building has long been a source of contention. In a decision handed down on 8 October 2014, the High Court in Brookfield Multiplex Limited v Owners Corporation...more

Does an Insurer Commit “Bad Faith” by Refusing to Settle Your Case?

Barry P. Goldberg is regularly asked whether an insurer is committing “bad faith” by failing or refusing to settle a case. Most accident victims do not realize that the “at fault” party’s insurer really owes virtually no duty...more

High Court hears appeal on hospital’s duty of care to man murdered by mental health patient

Last week, the High Court of Australia heard argument in an appeal against the decision of McKenna v Hunter & New England Local Health District; Simon v Hunter & New England Local Health District [2013] NSWCA 476. The...more

High Court Finds No Duty of Care From Builder to Owners Corporation

The High Court has held that a builder of a serviced apartment complex does not owe a duty of care in negligence for financial loss arising from defects in common property to an owner's corporation (Brookfield...more

Ebola in the Workplace – Dangerous to Employers

Returning from a trip to West Africa with some college buddies, Ben X. Posed, a waiter at Chotchkie’s, showed up for work with a fever, muscle aches, a strong headache, and stomach pains. Begging his boss Dee Manding for the...more

Implied Duties In An Employment Context – What May We Be Able To Learn From The UK Experience?

Earlier this month, the High Court of Australia delivered its ruling in the landmark case of Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker. In that ruling Australia's highest court decided that the duty of mutual trust and...more

Solicitors’ negligence – loss for intended beneficiary under a will

The NSW Court of Appeal has found that the fact that a person has reached a great age does not necessarily mean they are at death’s door or about to lose their marbles....more

Fast Five: Rhode Island Appellate Practice - September 2014

In a case of first impression, the Rhode Island Supreme Court held that a doctor who was hired by a third party to provide an opinion about a patient based solely on his review of the patient’s records did not owe a duty of...more

Message: Good Faith is Not Care

When an insurer issues a policy, it assumes a duty not only to investigate and pay claims, but to do so in good faith. There is, however, a difference between that duty and the duty of due care that arises under tort law. ...more

Texas Supreme Court Reinforces that Subcontractors May be Liable to Property Owners

On August 22, 2014, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that both the trial court and the court of appeals improperly dismissed a property owner's claim for negligence against a subcontractor for improper plumbing installation in...more

Take-Home Exposure Claims Under Review by California's High Court

On August 20, 2014, the California Supreme Court granted petitions for review in two published decisions that reached different conclusions on whether a defendant owed a duty for take-home exposures. Both matters (Haver v....more

92 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 4