Knick v. Township of Scott, U.S. Supreme Court No. 17-647 (decided 6/21/19) -
In a case resolving a complex procedural question about the ability of property owners to have access to federal courts for their disputes with...more
6/25/2019
/ 42 U.S.C. §1983 ,
Federal v State Law Application ,
Fifth Amendment ,
Inverse Condemnation ,
Just Compensation ,
Knick v Township of Scott Pennsylvania ,
Precedential Opinion ,
Property Owners ,
Reversal ,
SCOTUS ,
State Law Remedies ,
Takings Clause
Supreme Court Clarifies Valuation Rules on Potential for Future Exactions -
City of Perris v. Stamper S217738 (Cal. Supreme Court, July 21, 2016) -
Why it matters: The California Supreme Court reexamined the rules...more
9/2/2016
/ Bay Area ,
CA Supreme Court ,
CEQA ,
City Planning Departments ,
Condemnation ,
Eminent Domain ,
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) ,
Essential Nexus ,
General Plan ,
Greenhouse Gas Emissions ,
Housing Developers ,
Just Compensation ,
Low Carbon Fuel Standard ,
Property Dedication ,
Property Owners ,
Rough Proportionality Test ,
State and Local Government ,
Sustainability ,
Sustainable Communities Strategy ,
Urban Planning & Development ,
Valuation
Horne v. Department of Agriculture, No. 14-275 (U.S. June 22, 2015) -
Why It Matters: In a pro-property rights opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court applies Fifth Amendment “takings” analysis to a federal program that...more