Noa Baddish

Noa Baddish

Proskauer Rose LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › Sarbanes-Oxley

Share:

Texas Federal Court Gives SOX Whistleblower Another Big Bite At The Apple

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas recently ruled that a plaintiff had the right to a de novo review of her SOX whistleblower claims in federal district court even though she had already participated...more

10/7/2013 - DOL Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers

C.D. Cal. Greenlights SOX Claim, Analyzing Whether Scienter Must Be Shown Where Violation Of Internal Controls Is Alleged

On April 24, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California issued its final ruling that a SOX whistleblower complaint survived a Rule 12(b)(6) challenge. Zulfer v. Playboy Enterprises, Inc., No....more

5/7/2013 - Anti-Retaliation Provisions Internal Controls Sarbanes-Oxley Scienter Whistleblowers

Law360 Quotes Proskauer On Implications Of Third Circuit Decision Expanding SOX Whistleblower Protected Activity

In a recent Employment Law360 article (subscription required), Steve Pearlman, co-head of Proskauer’s Whistleblowing & Retaliation Group, commented on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Wiest v. Lynch, No....more

3/21/2013 - Protected Activity Sarbanes-Oxley Whistleblowers Wiest v Lynch

District Court Widens Split On Whether Complaints Of Alleged Future Misconduct Are Protected

The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ruled that a SOX whistleblower complaint survived a Rule 12(b)(6) challenge on “reasonable belief” grounds and found that complaints of potential future...more

2/18/2013 - Board of Directors Corporate Bonuses Federal Rule 12(b)(6) Fraud Internal Controls Playboy Potential Future Violations Retaliation Sarbanes-Oxley SEC Split of Authority Termination Whistleblowers

4 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1